Paul wrote:I created the poll for you. The poll creation function is at the bottom of the page when you are creating a new thread.


TENGU wrote:Why are you making uncorroborated assumptions again Otaku, FGS take those rosy j-glasses off. "Terms like 'jap'", what do you mean by this statement? contractions from country names? which contractions are ok and which aren't?
Paul wrote: (1)Keep this in mind Tengu, you are posting on a forum in Japan, needless to to say regarding Japan and education in Japan.
(2)One would think that people who post here would be culturally aware enough to understand that the use of the word jap when referring to anything related to this country or it's people would have enough common sense to not use vocabulary that very easily could be offensive to the country and it's people.
(3)Me thinks that you are being pedantic about me editing your post where you used that word. I sense it came from laziness more than a desire to piss anyone off.
(4)Live and learn.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5)Regarding my uncle, I can understand where his hatred was bred from, more so now that I live here and have seen things from the "other-side". However if wishes were horses then beggars would ride...........
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(6)Jap maybe part of the vernacular in "some" countries but NOT here. Refer to my first paragraph here.
(7)I think you need a lesson in cultural awareness here Tengu. You come across as if common sense is not a part of your vernacular or something that you practice either.
(8) Also your argument about what people in other countries say or do carries no weight here because that is there and this is here.
(9)Ignorance resides everywhere.
Gibbons wrote:A slang word about someone's country is only racist in a reasonably homogeneous country. That is why Jap or Nip are more offensive that Yank. I think singling out someone's race is especially offensive, especially if . I am sure you would all agree that N1gger is a lot more offensive than any of the terms Tengu posted here simply because it addresses race and only race.
Code is hidden from guests, please register and login to view itPaul wrote:Tengu making assumptions about what you think you know and what is actually a fact is a mother-mexter.
One other thing, here is a friendly warning for you, attack a persons opinion all you want but not the person.
Do not cross that line if you want to continue participating here.
TENGU wrote:would you like to make such comments via PM please, let's keep the thread on topic.
TENGU wrote:Still why is "gaijin" permissible when other racial slurs are not?
Also the term "gaijin"is not racist per say either as it refers to all foreigners
Next the word gaijin as you should also know is not universally used either.
The manner in which the word is used can be taken any number of different ways
...it is in Japan, that's where we are and that's what matters right? You edited Jap because someone might find it offensive in Japan yet you let "gaijin" stand.
I can safely say I've been entwined in twice as many cultures as you ever will.
Assumptions Tengu, assumptions......Paul wrote:
Once a person here finally understands the manner in which the word is used by the majority it seems of Japanese people it no longer is a problem.
Paul wrote:Tell us all in your ever seemingly endless wisdom here Tengu what the difference is between the words gaijin and gaikokujin.
Paul wrote:
I can safely say I've been entwined in twice as many cultures as you ever will.Assumptions Tengu, assumptions......
TENGU wrote:Paul wrote:
Once a person here finally understands the manner in which the word is used by the majority it seems of Japanese people it no longer is a problem.
And here is the crux of the issue, your reliance on cultural relativism to validate a weak argument. Once you understand that the majority of Japanese people see themselves as being intrinsically different from other nationals, you can see how, from their perspective, separating the world into two groups is the only natural progression and must be reinforced in as many ways as possible. So if one takes on board the Japanese mentality all is well. Very nice.
Do you refer to your own children as half-gaijin? Do you refer to non Japanese as gaijin when dealing with students? Do you reinforce the idea of gaijin in your classes? I suspect you don't.Paul wrote:Tell us all in your ever seemingly endless wisdom here Tengu what the difference is between the words gaijin and gaikokujin.
why koku of course.
btw. it's per se ね
your reliance on cultural relativism to validate a weak argument.
Paul wrote:
Essentially they are the same, it is just semantics.
TENGU wrote:Paul wrote:
Essentially they are the same, it is just semantics.
why bother with anything Paul, if it's "just semantics".
Don't buy into that cheap epithet, it's not just semantics, words matter, you as a teacher of language should understand that.
Paul wrote:TENGU wrote:Paul wrote:
Read what I wrote about picking and choosing which battles I choose to fight. If you want to take on the entire world or the roughly 125 million Japanese be my guest but you will only be leading a parade of one.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests